Are you paying too much for EPR compliance, dismantling, take-back, and recycling of PV modules?
Automate processes, reduce costs
Many companies incur unnecessary costs, risks, and operational friction throughout the lifecycle of PV modules because compliance, decommissioning, take-back, recycling, and documentation are not properly aligned. This is exactly where we come in: first, we create transparency around obligations, costs, responsibilities, and process weaknesses. Then, we automate where manual workflows, media discontinuities, and unnecessary interfaces currently have a negative impact on the economic efficiency of the value chain.
- Are you possibly paying fees for quantities that may have been reported incorrectly or even twice?
- The old PV modules are finally dismantled. But who is responsible now?
- You are paying compliance costs, but don’t fully understand how they arise?
- Repowering is coming up, but what happens to the old modules now?
Bordmittel® and PVMRC combine compliance and operational execution.
Many companies treat the placing on the market, decommissioning, and recycling of PV modules as separate topics. This is precisely why unnecessary costs and risks arise — because a robust end-to-end perspective, from placing on the market to final documentation, is missing. Avoidable media discontinuities, coordination efforts, and a lack of transparency in compliance processes cost real money.
Bordmittel® and PVMRC create exactly this transparency — across costs, compliance, responsibilities, and operational processes throughout the entire lifecycle of PV modules, from placing on the market to documented recycling.
iStock.com / atakan
The PV compliance and recycling check by Bordmittel® and PVMRC
The assessment provides an independent evaluation of your current situation. Free from any conflict of interest and not tied to any specific provider. Bordmittel® analyzes compliance and cost considerations, while PVMRC evaluates operational feasibility. The result is a comprehensive overview, covering everything from reporting requirements to final recycling.
iStock.com / tsingha25
After the check, you'll have a clear picture
The assessment provides a comprehensive analysis of your PV module lifecycle process—from regulatory obligations and responsibilities, through costs, reporting, and documentation, to operational risks and recycling potential. This provides you with a solid foundation for clearly identifying weaknesses, unnecessary expenses, and opportunities for cost savings throughout the entire process.
After the check, you’ll know exactly:
✓ What obligations manufacturers, importers, operators, and service providers actually have
✓ Whether your compliance and recycling costs are reasonable
✓ Where unnecessary fees and legal costs arise
✓ How robust your reporting and documentation processes are
✓ Where operational risks and audit risks are hidden.
✓ Whether your regulatory obligations and reporting processes are being implemented correctly
✓ What are the potential for a second life and for reuse?
✓ Whether compliance agencies and service providers operate in a transparent and controllable manner
✓ What a more cost-effective and secure end-to-end process might look like, and which measures yield the greatest economic benefits
iStock.com / tudiostockart
Important to keep in mind, but unfortunately often overlooked
Regulatory compliance obligations related to EAR, WEEE, and EPR generally apply to manufacturers, importers, and other market participants who place products on the market. As a rule, operators and asset owners are not subject to these manufacturer obligations. Their responsibilities in the context of dismantling and end-of-life processes include:
of proper return
of recycling
of documentation and proof of compliance
The check-in in 3 Steps
The Compliance Check is designed not only to assess regulatory requirements, but also to evaluate the entire lifecycle process of PV modules in terms of its practical and economic impact. The approach is structured, transparent, and aimed at quickly providing clarity on risks, costs, and optimization potential.
We analyze whether your compliance and EPR processes are cost-effective, transparent, and robust.
- Are you paying too much due to overreporting, incorrect classifications, or duplicate reports?
- Can compliance costs be broken down by product, country, material, or business unit?
- Do your compliance agencies operate in a transparent and accountable manner?
- Are there opportunities to reduce costs related to fees, agency costs, internal expenses, or process costs?
We examine the entire process chain related to the collection, dismantling, and recycling of PV modules.
- Are there any Excel workarounds, media breaks, or manual alignments?
- Is the process from placing the product on the market through to take-back, disassembly, recycling and verification truly organized end-to-end?
- Do you offer package deals for new modules that include disposal options?
- Are the handoffs between the operator, the decommissioning company, the logistics provider, and the recycling partner clearly defined?
We identify risks throughout the entire compliance and process chain and make them manageable.
- Have registration, reporting, volume reporting, certificates, and responsibilities been fully clarified?
- Are there risks associated with missing data, unclear responsibilities, or incorrect declarations?
- Will your waste disposal records stand up to an audit?
- Are there better models for management, auditing, or handover?
Smart Compliance, Seamless Implementation – End-to-End
Bordmittel® analyzes the compliance, reporting, data, and cost dimensions. PVMRC is responsible for the operational feasibility across decommissioning, logistics, second-life use, and recycling. Together, we create transparency across the entire end-of-life process—with clearly defined responsibilities, a transparent division of roles, and no conflicts of interest.
Bordmittel® | Compliance Intelligence
Assessment of EPR responsibilities and compliance structures
Data management & data quality in the context of reporting
Cost review & savings potential
Agency management & governance
Audit readiness & cocumentation
Assessment of EAR Portal, WEEE, and EPR-related reporting and compliance processes
PVMRC | Operational Execution
Dismantling & construction site management
Logistics & material flows
PV Module testing & evaluation
Second Life & value preservation
Recycling & recovery
Documentation & certificates
Repowering projects & decommissioning
Who is the check relevant for?
PV decommissioning, recycling, and compliance affect different functions within a company each with its own questions, responsibilities, and levels of urgency. The check provides a sound and reliable basis for each of these perspectives.
iStock.com / SonerCdem
Manufacturers, importers, and distributors
Duties, roles, and responsibilities
Key Topics: Placing on the market, WEEE/EPR obligations, volume reporting, fees, and take-back responsibility.
Together, we’ll clarify:
whether quantities, product categories, and country-specific requirements are correctly reflected
where overreporting, duplicate reports, and unnecessary fees occur
which database is reliable for reporting, documentation, and audits
how responsibilities are clearly delineated among suppliers, marketplaces, importers, and service providers
how agencies and recycling partners can be managed more transparently and effectively
Costs, fees, and cost-effectiveness
Common question: are our compliance, recycling, and process costs reasonable, or do they need to be adjusted?
Together, we make transparent:
where direct and hidden costs arise in the process
Which fees and agency costs can be avoided
where manual processes result in unnecessary internal personnel costs
How to reduce risks associated with retroactive payments, penalties, and additional audit expenses
which cost-saving and improvement measures offer the greatest economic leverage
Documentation, data quality, and auditability
Common question: Are the quantities, documentation, certificates, and reports accurate and audit-ready?
Together, we ensure that:
that certificates and recycling records are complete, accurate, and reliable
that quantity reports are validated and traceable
that the data quality for ESG, CSRD, and compliance reports is robust
that responsibilities are clearly defined and risks do not get stuck between the parties involved
how the existing agency and service provider structure can be independently evaluated
iStock.com / deyanarobova
EPCs, PV operators, and asset owners
Key topics: Decommissioning, repowering, end-of-life modules, compliance documentation, disposal safety, and the proper return and recycling of PV modules.
Together, we’ll clarify:
how dismantling, logistics, and recycling are coordinated and interlinked
What operator responsibilities actually exist with regard to return, recycling, and record-keeping?
where operational friction can be reduced on construction sites and in facilities
how clean certificates and reliable proof of compliance are ensured
how to better control costs in decommissioning and waste disposal projects
how to prevent old devices or modules from getting stuck in the process in an uncontrolled manner
Common question: Can we efficiently combine assembly, disassembly, return, and disposal?
Together, we’re improving the management of:
Service providers whose services, quality, and costs become easier to compare
clearly defined scope of services covering disassembly, logistics, recycling, and compliance
avoidable additional costs resulting from unclear disposal or reporting requirements
a solid purchasing foundation for end-of-life and take-back services
Common question: How can we avoid operational friction, media breaks, and obsolete modules that are left behind?
Together, we stabilize the process by:
a coordinated end-to-end process involving all stakeholders
Clear handoff points between the site, logistics, the recycler, and reporting
significantly fewer manual adjustments and media breaks
Minimized risks associated with improperly stored, misdirected, or incompletely documented end-of-life equipment
greater predictability regarding decommissioning, repowering, and buyback
“
